After delving into some pointless research I observed that statistics (and not a made up one) say that more than half the people are satisfied with status quo as far as living life goes rather than looking out for newer possibilities. I get it, Newton's First Law of inertia.
"A body continues to be in a state of rest or uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force"
Two points to be observed here.
1. It says 'body'. Sure, scientifically speaking it includes all bodies living/dead/imaginary, but since this is not a blog on science (*sigh*), when do we use the word body generally? Hmm 'Anybody','somebody', but again this isn't a blog on the English language either (*sigh*). So, no points for guessing, we usually use the term body for corpses. Urges me to think whether the law should apply to living, mobile beings like us humans.
2. Does it ever happen in practical life that a body continues moving incessantly? So should the law actually have any significance to us humans and our way of living then?
So, I've (yet again) proved using my evergreen flawless logic that the Law of inertia is null and void as far how we live our lives is concerned. People who want a constant life, no extreme points are well medically alive but dead in all other aspects. The EKG graph of a person who is dead is a straight line, no ups and no downs. Just putting it out there.
![]() |
ALIVE |
![]() |
dead |
At some point of life, you got to ask yourself the question, are you alive or just breathing? The earlier, the better.